CFSL Integrated Report 2022

| CIM FINANCE. INTEGRATED REPORT 2022 130 EXPLANATORY NOTES 30 SEPTEMBER 2022 3. SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING ESTIMATES AND JUDGEMENTS The preparation of the Group’s and Company’s financial statements require management to make judgements, estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of revenues, expenses, assets and liabilities, and the accompanying disclosures, and the disclosure of contingent liabilities. Uncertainty about these assumptions and estimates could result in outcomes that require a material adjustment to the carrying amount of assets or liabilities affected in future periods. In the process of applying the Group’s and the Company’s accounting policies, management have made the following judgements and assumptions concerning the future and other key sources of estimation uncertainty at the reporting date, that have a significant risk of causing a material adjustment to the carrying amounts of assets and liabilities within the next financial year. Existing circumstances and assumptions about future developmentsmay change due to circumstances beyond the Group’s and the Company’s control and are reflected in the assumptions if and when they occur. Items with the most significant effect on the amounts recognised in the financial statements with substantial management judgement and/or estimates are collated below: (a) Going concern The Group’s and the Company’s management has made an assessment of its ability to continue as a going concern and is satisfied that it has the resources to continue in business for the foreseeable future. Furthermore, management is not aware of anymaterial uncertainties that may cast significant doubt on the Group’s and the Company’s ability to continue as a going concern. Therefore, the financial statements continue to be prepared on the going concern basis. (b) Calculation of ECL allowance The Group and the Company apply a number of significant judgements in applying the accounting requirements for the calculation of ECL, such as: • Determining criteria for significant increase of credit risk: ECL are measured as an allowance equal to 12-month ECL for stage 1 assets, or lifetime ECL for stage 2 or stage 3 assets. An asset moves to stage 2 when its credit risk has increased significantly since initial recognition. IFRS 9 does not define what constitutes a significant increase in credit risk. In assessing whether the credit risk of an asset has significantly increased the Group and the Company take into account qualitative and quantitative reasonable and supportable forward-looking information. • Choosing appropriate models and assumptions used: The Group and the Company use model and assumptions in measuring fair value of financial assets as well as in estimating ECL. Judgement is applied in identifying the most appropriate model for each type of asset, as well as for determining the assumptions used in these models, including assumptions that relate to key drivers of credit risk. • Establishing groups of assets with similar credit risk characteristics: When ECLs aremeasured on a collective basis, the financial instruments are grouped on the basis of shared risk characteristics. The Group and the Company monitor the appropriateness of the credit risk characteristics on an ongoing basis to assess whether they continue to be similar. This is required in order to ensure that, should credit risk characteristics change, there is appropriate re-segmentation of the assets. This may result in new portfolios being created or assets moving to an existing portfolio that better reflects the similar credit risk characteristics of that group of assets. Re-segmentation of portfolios and movement between portfolios is more common when there is a significant increase in credit risk (or when that significant increase reverses) and so assets move from 12-month to lifetime ECLs, or vice versa, but it can also occur within portfolios that continue to be measured on the same basis of 12-month or lifetime ECLs but the amount of ECL changes because the credit risk of the portfolios differs. (c) Fair value estimation The fair value of financial instruments is the price that would be received to sell an asset or paid to transfer a liability in an orderly transaction in the principal (ormost advantageous) market at themeasurement date under currentmarket conditions (i.e., an exit price) regardless of whether that price is directly observable or estimated using another valuation technique. When the fair values of financial assets and financial liabilities recorded in the statement of financial position cannot be derived from active markets, they are determined using a variety of valuation techniques that include the use of valuation models. The inputs to these models are taken from observable markets where possible, but where this is not feasible, estimation is required in establishing fair values.

RkJQdWJsaXNoZXIy MzQ3MjQ5